US election lesson: Dangers of the Opposition/PAP echo chambers

When Barack Obama won his 2nd term, I breathed a sigh of relief. At least the world is a safer place for another 4 more years. But perhaps I shouldn’t have been too concerned. According to analysis of polling data, Obama had an 86% chance of winning the election. It would have been a walkover, so why worry?

But hardcore Republicans didn’t believe the reports. Romney was reportedly so confident that he would win that he didn’t even prepare a concession speech. When the curtain fell, Republicans were shell-shocked. They couldn’t believe they had lost. The question is “Why didn’t they see it coming?”

The Republicans were ultimately misinformed because they were victims of conservative media. Right-leaning Fox News and conservative radio talk shows by people like Rush Limbaugh consistently drilled the message into their audience that Obama was evil, Obama’s policies were bad for America, and Obama was sure to lose. Their conservative audience lapped it all up. The conservative media created a wall within America, causing conservatives to denounce anyone who would support or even mildly sympathise with Obama. In the end, the conservative media failed its audience by warping their mindset beyond reality.

But if Fox News is so bad, why do people still watch it? If Rush Limbaugh is clearly an idiotic racist, why is he so popular? The unfortunate reality is that it is tempting to retreat into our own ideological echo chambers. Fox News is popular because its audience are people who already want to hear why Obama is the worst president in America’s history. Most people want to be surrounded by others who share the same values and beliefs. The echo chamber becomes a bubble that causes its listeners to mistrust anything that conflicts with its ideology, at the expense of drowning out reasonable voices.

Now that the problem has been identified, why can’t the Americans fix Fox News? In fact, why can’t Fox News fix itself and truly become “fair and balanced”? This is another unfortunate problem, because Fox News ultimately relies on an audience to make a living, and it has discovered that the easiest way to make money is to simply tell its audience what it wants to hear, whether it is the truth or not. Can you really blame Fox when people prefer to hear a beautiful lie instead of the ugly truth?

Echo Chamber Parallels in Singapore

The echo chamber syndrome is well and alive in Singapore. Both Opposition and PAP supporters suffer from it, although the opposition gets it much worse.

Pro-PAP social media is almost non-existant. Today, the only “prominent” example is Fabrications by the PAP, which is mostly a one-man operation anyway and therefore will never be able to grow into a powerhouse social media site. The mainstream media still adheres to PAP’s OB markers, but this media is morally bound to report factual issues as well as give the opposition some fair coverage for major news items.

Anti-PAP social media that focus solely on news putting PAP in a bad light are immensely popular. Temasek Review, Temasek times, TRS and to some extent TOC are our prime candidates. It doesn’t take a genius to check out these websites’ contents and conclude that their main entree of anti-PAP articles is an echo chamber. The nature of most comments left behind by its audience simply reinforces this point. The most rabid anti-PAP readers distrust almost anything that the mainstream media says, and any hint of sympathy towards the PAP is bashed in the most cynical manner. Websites like TRE know that they are popular because of their anti-PAP content. In order to keep their audience, their editors are naturally incentivised to keep the anti-PAP content flowing.

While there is nothing wrong with exposing the stupid things that the PAP does, this has to be balanced by the good things the PAP have achieved. Only the most cynical of Singaporeans will believe that one of the most admired and efficient governments in the world is made up of incompetent and corrupt politicians that are out to steal our lunch.

I fear that the echo chamber problems facing the US Republican party have replicated themselves in Singapore’s Anti-PAP social media. The “us” versus “them” mentality has grown stronger since the 2011 General Elections. Unfortunately, the politics of resentment can only go so far. A properly functional democracy requires us to accept that our society is really about many people with different interests pointing in different directions.  Cherian George himself said: “Democracy requires the right to speak, and this is where the internet has come to the fore. But democracy also expects of citizens that we listen, to hear views different from our own, to negotiate and, if necessary, compromise. We need spaces for such deliberation and social conciliation.”

Advertisements

About sgthinker

I'm a 40-year old Singaporean male, and this blog pens down my thoughts and feelings about Singapore's political happenings, government policies and society trends. I hope this blog will provide a moderate voice in the growing online debate about the state of Singapore's society. Some of the posts here won't be solely written by me, since there will be times when other writers are more eloquent at expressing their views, in which case I'll share their insights (along with my comments). The content on this blog is owned by me.If you wish to share or reproduce the content, please attribute it to this blog.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to US election lesson: Dangers of the Opposition/PAP echo chambers

  1. Pingback: Dear Western Media: Singapore is a democracy and the PAP rules by popular consent | sgthinker.wordpress.com

  2. Pingback: Beware those who deny change to themselves | sgthinker.wordpress.com

  3. Anonymous says:

    You clearly don’t know squat about US politics. The infamous drone program that kills Pakistani and Afghanistan civilians from 9000 miles away controlled in an air-conditioned room without harming a single American life is an Obama program. Who was the president that claimed the credit of killing Osama Bin Laden? Why do so many ignorant twits living all around the world delude themselves with libtard kool-aid, or since they live in Singapore, sugarcane juice about American politics when they know not even 1% of it? The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were conducted in retaliation to not only 9/11, but at least seven terrorist attacks that took American lives in US embassies worldwide since then. The American mission to protect her citizens while upholding its aggressive pro-Israel and pro-democracy foreign policy is not exclusively a Republican thing or a Democratic thing. It is an American thing.

    So you should refrain from sounding so definitively “cock-sure”.

    You should also look up the popular votes received by both Obama and Romney. Obama won only by the skin of his teeth.

    One last thing. You don’t have a clue about the rationale most Republicans in the US are Republicans and the reason they vote Republican. I actually live in the US. Its got nothing to do with sensational issues that grab the attention of foreigners outside the US such as gay rights or abortions.

    So you should shut your trap about American politics.

  4. Pingback: Weekly Round Up: Week 46 (12 Nov – 16 Nov 2012) | The Singapore Daily

  5. Norm says:

    I get turned off by both the pro government MSM and the anti government online media. But with the latter at least it’s a fair battleground of opinions – the pro PAP crowd are free to express their views online too. Not so with the MSM, obviously. Why can’t we be trusted to make up our own minds?

  6. voiddecker says:

    I totally agree with you. How many times have we read comments like “wait till 2016!” on these websites, as if anything is really going to change in 2016 when all they are doing is preaching to the 40%.

  7. The says:

    Forget about the newspapers and the various polls – they are partisan. The best source is Ladbrokes – they put their money where their mouth is – and they clearly showed that the odds are for an Obama victory.

    I suggest Singapore Pools, or Ladbrokes should have bets on the next GE results.

  8. Pingback: Daily SG: 16 Nov 2012 | The Singapore Daily

  9. Pingback: Alternative Media: Echo Chambers of One sided views | Singapore Daily News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s